Sales & RevenueBeginner
Lead Qualification Framework
Score and qualify leads based on criteria and fit
#lead#qualification#scoring#sales
CLAUDE.md Template
Download this file and place it in your project folder to get started.
# Lead Qualification
Score and qualify leads based on defined criteria to focus sales efforts effectively.
## Overview
This workflow helps you:
- Evaluate leads against qualification criteria
- Score leads for prioritization
- Identify deal-breakers and green flags
- Recommend next actions
- Maintain consistent qualification
## Qualification Frameworks
### BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline)
```markdown
## BANT Qualification: [Lead Name]
### Budget (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Defined budget? | [Yes/No/Unknown] | /10 |
| Budget range? | [$X - $Y] | /10 |
| Budget fits our pricing? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Budget Score**: [X]/25
### Authority (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Decision maker? | [Yes/No/Influencer] | /10 |
| Who else involved? | [Names/Roles] | /5 |
| Sign-off process? | [Description] | /5 |
| Champion identified? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Authority Score**: [X]/25
### Need (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Clear pain point? | [Description] | /10 |
| Impact of not solving? | [Description] | /10 |
| Using alternatives? | [Current solution] | /5 |
**Need Score**: [X]/25
### Timeline (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Target implementation? | [Date/Quarter] | /10 |
| Urgency level? | [High/Medium/Low] | /10 |
| Trigger event? | [Description] | /5 |
**Timeline Score**: [X]/25
---
**Total BANT Score**: [X]/100
**Qualification**: [Qualified / Needs Work / Not Qualified]
```
### MEDDIC (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion)
```markdown
## MEDDIC Qualification: [Lead Name]
### Metrics
**Business impact they expect**:
- [Metric 1]: [Current] ā [Target]
- [Metric 2]: [Current] ā [Target]
### Economic Buyer
**Person with budget authority**:
- Name: [Name]
- Title: [Title]
- Access: [Direct/Indirect/None]
### Decision Criteria
**How they'll evaluate solutions**:
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: [%]
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: [%]
3. [Criterion 3] - Weight: [%]
### Decision Process
**Steps to purchase**:
1. [Step 1] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
2. [Step 2] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
3. [Step 3] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
### Identify Pain
**Core problem**:
[Description of the pain point]
**Implications of not solving**:
[Business impact]
### Champion
**Internal advocate**:
- Name: [Name]
- Influence level: [High/Medium/Low]
- What they gain: [Personal win]
---
**MEDDIC Coverage**: [X]/6 elements confirmed
**Deal Health**: [Strong / At Risk / Weak]
```
### GPCTBA/C&I (Goals, Plans, Challenges, Timeline, Budget, Authority, Consequences & Implications)
```markdown
## GPCTBA/C&I: [Lead Name]
### Goals
What are they trying to achieve?
- [Goal 1]
- [Goal 2]
### Plans
How do they plan to achieve it?
- [Current plan]
### Challenges
What's stopping them?
- [Challenge 1]
- [Challenge 2]
### Timeline
When do they need to achieve this?
- Target: [Date]
- Urgency: [High/Medium/Low]
### Budget
What resources are allocated?
- Amount: [Range]
- Approved: [Yes/No/Pending]
### Authority
Who makes the decision?
- Decision Maker: [Name]
- Influencers: [Names]
- Process: [Description]
### Consequences (Negative)
What happens if they don't solve this?
- [Consequence 1]
- [Consequence 2]
### Implications (Positive)
What happens when they succeed?
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]
```
## Lead Scoring Model
### Fit Score (Demographics)
```markdown
## Fit Scoring Criteria
### Company Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Industry | /15 | [Industry] | |
| Company Size | /15 | [Employees] | |
| Revenue | /10 | [Revenue] | |
| Geography | /10 | [Location] | |
**Company Fit**: [X]/50
### Contact Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Title/Role | /20 | [Title] | |
| Department | /15 | [Dept] | |
| Seniority | /15 | [Level] | |
**Contact Fit**: [X]/50
**Total Fit Score**: [X]/100
```
### Engagement Score (Behavioral)
```markdown
## Engagement Scoring
### Website Activity
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Pricing page view | 10 | [X] | |
| Demo request | 25 | [X] | |
| Content download | 5 | [X] | |
| Blog visit | 2 | [X] | |
### Email Engagement
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Email opened | 1 | [X] | |
| Link clicked | 3 | [X] | |
| Replied | 10 | [X] | |
### Event Participation
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Webinar attended | 15 | [X] | |
| Meeting booked | 25 | [X] | |
**Total Engagement Score**: [X]/100
```
## Output Format
### Lead Qualification Report
```markdown
# Lead Qualification: [Company/Contact]
## Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Fit Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Engagement Score** | [X]/100 |
| **BANT Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Overall** | [X]/100 |
## Qualification Status
š¢ **QUALIFIED** / š” **NEEDS NURTURING** / š“ **NOT QUALIFIED**
## Key Findings
### ā
Green Flags
1. [Positive indicator]
2. [Positive indicator]
### ā ļø Yellow Flags
1. [Concern that needs addressing]
2. [Missing information]
### ā Red Flags
1. [Deal-breaker or major concern]
## Gaps to Address
| Gap | Question to Ask | Priority |
|-----|-----------------|----------|
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | High |
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | Medium |
## Recommended Next Steps
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Follow-up action]
3. [Long-term action]
## Disqualification Criteria Check
- [ ] Below minimum company size
- [ ] Outside target geography
- [ ] No budget authority
- [ ] Timeline > 12 months
- [ ] Already using competitor with lock-in
```
## Best Practices
### Qualification Tips
1. **Ask open-ended questions**: Get context, not just yes/no
2. **Verify, don't assume**: Confirm information directly
3. **Document everything**: Keep CRM updated
4. **Re-qualify regularly**: Situations change
5. **Know when to walk away**: Time is valuable
### Common Mistakes
- Qualifying too quickly
- Ignoring red flags
- Not identifying all stakeholders
- Assuming budget = ability to buy
- Forgetting to re-qualify over time
## Limitations
- Cannot access CRM data directly
- Scoring requires defined criteria from user
- Cannot verify provided information
- Qualification is guidance, not guarantee
- Human judgment still essentialREADME.md
What This Does
Score and qualify leads based on defined criteria to focus sales efforts effectively.
Quick Start
Step 1: Create a Project Folder
mkdir -p ~/Documents/LeadQualification
Step 2: Download the Template
Click Download above, then:
mv ~/Downloads/CLAUDE.md ~/Documents/LeadQualification/
Step 3: Start Working
cd ~/Documents/LeadQualification
claude
Output Format
Lead Qualification Report
# Lead Qualification: [Company/Contact]
Best Practices
Qualification Tips
- Ask open-ended questions: Get context, not just yes/no
- Verify, don't assume: Confirm information directly
- Document everything: Keep CRM updated
- Re-qualify regularly: Situations change
- Know when to walk away: Time is valuable
Common Mistakes
- Qualifying too quickly
- Ignoring red flags
- Not identifying all stakeholders
- Assuming budget = ability to buy
- Forgetting to re-qualify over time
Limitations
- Cannot access CRM data directly
- Scoring requires defined criteria from user
- Cannot verify provided information
- Qualification is guidance, not guarantee
- Human judgment still essential